On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 09:32 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > > > I'd suggest we do what we do all over the place: carry patches as > > necessary. It sucks, and rebasing is non-trivial work, but I would argue > > it's not nearly as much work as rebuilding everything from scratch. > > That's like forking a project, but deleting all the code you forked > > before you begin. > > I think there is a logical mistake in the above statement because we > aren't starting from scratch here. We have pagure.io and ipsilon and a > lot of other applications already. They have a lot of deployments that > proved themselves. > What we faced with is a bit where adding new features to them means a > need to find new contributors to share the load. Not just that. AIUI, there are significant issues with scaling for Pagure. It wasn't really initially designed to be very scalable, so now we have bigger and bigger instances of it and more and more people throwing in pull requests and issues and things, it's getting pretty creaky. Pingou and Patrick are working on this, AIUI, but it's not an *easy* problem to solve. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
