Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 19:26 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot via devel: > Le mardi 16 juillet 2019 à 18:53 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser a > écrit : > > > > Which build chain does look cleaner, shorter, and more semantically > > correct? > > > > 1. systemd (no cryptsetup) --> json-c (new so-ver) --> cryptsetup > > --> systemd (with cryptsetup) --> other consumers in chains > > > > 2. json-c (double so-ver) --> cryptsetup and all other consumers > > --> json-c (new so-ver) > > > > The second may look shorter but it is certainly not more correct. At > the end of it you still can't be sure everything has been built using > the new so-ver, so you need to add at least one rebuild stage using > the > new json-c to be sure the result is self-hosting. > > Any way you look at it, the last stage should involve rebuilding all > dependant packages over a repo state that includes only the final > state > of the changed package, or you may unadvertently still depend on > things > you think you removed That example was a bit shortened… My actual build-chain in that case is: json-c (double so-ver) --> cryptsetup --> json-c (new so-ver) --> all other consumers
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
