Re: nettle: heads up soname bump

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mardi 16 juillet 2019 à 18:53 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser a
écrit :
> 
> 
> Which build chain does look cleaner, shorter, and more semantically
> correct?
> 
>   1.  systemd (no cryptsetup) --> json-c (new so-ver) --> cryptsetup
>       --> systemd (with cryptsetup) --> other consumers in chains
> 
>   2.  json-c (double so-ver) --> cryptsetup and all other consumers
>       --> json-c (new so-ver)
> 

The second may look shorter but it is certainly not more correct. At
the end of it you still can't be sure everything has been built using
the new so-ver, so you need to add at least one rebuild stage using the
new json-c to be sure the result is self-hosting. 

Any way you look at it, the last stage should involve rebuilding all
dependant packages over a repo state that includes only the final state
of the changed package, or you may unadvertently still depend on things
you think you removed

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux