Re: nettle: heads up soname bump

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 00:20 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > gnutls now cannot be rebuilt:
> > 
> > nothing provides libnettle.so.6 needed by gnutls-3.6.8-
> > 1.fc31.armv7hl
> 
> Don't you love circular dependencies?
> 
> This is really the biggest issue that we have: There are more and
> more 
> circular dependencies. Each of them is a major PITA when trying to
> upgrade a 
> library.


Here[1] is a nice example of how to break the cycle by building both so-
versions in a bootstrap build.

With the bootstrap build one can chain-build all consumers to use the
new so-version.  After that has been finished one simply rebuilds the
lib without bootstrap to just get the new so-version.

Let me know if you want me to change the nettle spec file accordingly to
the given example and trigger a working rebuild chain.

Cheers,
Björn


[1]  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/json-c/blob/master/f/json-c.spec

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux