Re: kernel-2.6.11-1.1166_FC4.src.rpm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 10:37:19PM -0500, David Cary Hart wrote:
> The config files, themselves have a "DO NOT EDIT" legend. Text editing
> these is perilous because they are ambiguous. Moreover, using the Linux
> tools (make config or make menuconfig) eliminates the potential for
> selecting mutually exclusive options. In addition, the Linux tools
> automatically add dependent options. You cannot do either by editing a
> text file.

Okay, that all sounds reasonable, but must be missing something here in your
chain of logic getting from this to your complaint. Why not
use the config tools?

> Kernel rpm builds are different from most other rpm builds. In most
> other cases, customizing the package means customizing the ./configure
> options which are clearly apparent in the spec file. That's simply not
> the case with kernels.

In most cases that I deal with, customizing the package means adding
additional patches or source files. The kernel RPM is kind of big and crazy,
but fundamentally no different in this respect.

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux