On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 21:46 -0500, Sean wrote: > On Thu, March 3, 2005 9:44 pm, David Cary Hart said: > > On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 21:38 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > >> On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 21:31 -0500, David Cary Hart wrote: > >> > What happened to buildsrc? Did I miss something somewhere? > >> > >> It died a while back. Use the SRPM instead. > > > > WHAT SRPM? Note that I am referring to "src.rpm" from which I have > > always been able to build source. The result should be kernel- > > sourcecode-2.6.11-1.1166_FC4.rpmbuild.i686.rpm. This was accomplished > > through: > > > > Hi David, > > It's been widely discussed and is mentioned in the release notes. There > is no real need for kernel-source as it duplicates the contents of the > src.rpm itself. > > See: http://fcp.homelinux.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=1 > No. What has been widely discussed is the elimination of the pre- compiled kernel-source. HOWEVER, I have always been able to compile the kernel-source myself from the src.rpm. The current src.rpm does not have the code necessary for creating kernel-source. There is no way to customize the FC4 kernel without hacking the config files which is a VERY bad idea. I am very well aware of the FC3 release notes. In fact: http://www.tqmcube.com/fc3_custom_kernel.htm -- Total Quality Management - A Commitment to Excellence Fight Spam: http://www.tqmcube.com/rbldnsd.htm Daily Updates: rsync -t \ tqmcube.com::spamlists/[README.htm][clients][dynamic][relays][asiaspam] http://www.tqmcube.com/spam_trap.htm
