Re: Proposal: Abandon v8 package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Great, thanks. I took a look and did a review. I have a couple minor
tweaks I'd like to see, then I'll go ahead and merge it (and
backport/sideport it to the 8.x and 11.x branches)

On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 6:44 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade
<quantum.analyst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 16:24, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 7:02 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade
> > <quantum.analyst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Let's try this again, but CC'ing the package owners.
> > >
> > > On 2019-02-17 9:12 p.m., Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for resurrecting a long-dead thread, but a few things happened recently:
> > > > 1. v8 was just retired last week or so,
> > > > 2. R-V8 just ported itself from v8-314 to v8 LTS 6/7.
> > > >
> > > > Currently, R-V8 supports both v8-314 and v8, but as the latter fixes several downstream package issues, it is the recommended build target. I expect that eventually they will stop supporting 314 as well. This leaves me in a bit of a pickle as it does not bundle v8 and neither I nor upstream have any plans to build it ourselves.
> > > >
> > > >> For all of these same reasons, the Node.js SIG opted to carry a bundled
> > > >> copy of v8 in that package as well. I think we should move to have v8
> > > >> considered to be a copylib for all reasonable purposes within Fedora.
> > > >
> > > > In Debian, the nodejs package provides a stable *shared* v8 library, and the recommended install is against libnode-dev. Unfortunately, in Fedora, while nodejs-devel provides v8.h, it does *not* provide any shared library.
> > > >
> > > > Is this something we can also do in Fedora, i.e., split out a nodejs-libs subpackage, or similar?
> > > >
> >
> >
> > I've been keeping the Node.js packages in Fedora alive, but on
> > life-support, for a couple years now. I don't have the cycles to look
> > into a significant rework of how they're designed. If you have ideas
> > for how to do what you're asking, I will happily review a pull request
> > to http://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs
>
> OK, I've sent a pull-request to do so [1]. It essentially mimics what
> the Debian package does (pass --shared and then manually install the
> executable since their script will only install one or the other.) The
> other changes just make sure paths are correct for tests to work. It
> works for me [2] to build R-V8 (though copr gets stuck building nodejs
> on x86_64 for some reason.)
>
> [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs/pull-request/4
> [2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/qulogic/nodejs-R-V8/builds/
>
> --
> Elliott
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux