> TLDR , apt-rpm should be retired because nobody use it since more than > 10 years . > > I maintain a lot of debian package in Fedora but apt-debian still not > on Official repos you can get it from my devel corp repo [1] > My goal is make a system where rpm produce deb files , to allow Debian > migrate from deb to rpm . > rpm is much more powerful than Debian IMHO . > > [1] > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/debs/monitor/ > > > I can build .deb packages in Fedora and download packages with apt- > debian : > > debuild -i -us -uc -b -d > from > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Creating_packages_for_other_distributions#Tips_and_tricks_2 That's the beauty of the DPKG ecosystem, you always have a myriad of seemingly same tools and they often lack consistency. Should I use debuild, dpkg-buildpackage, or one of the two others? With or without rules? Should I rely on debhelper? The list goes on. > You may also need to override dh_shlibdeps by adding the following > lines to debian/rules: > > override_dh_shlibdeps: > > dh_shlibdeps --dpkg-shlibdeps-params=--ignore-missing-info Yes, that one needs an override on Fedora. > and > override_dh_strip_nondeterminism: That one should be solved by one of my package submissions. > From [1] "I'd like propose retire this apt and fedora-package-config- > apt". > > [1] > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462485 Again, I have no problem with apt-rpm if someone wants to maintain it and it keeps working, my problem is that it's called apt. Dridi _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
