On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:30 PM Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As long as we have no idea if the other maintainers are active, I am
strongly against the automation. I've been there. Followed nor
responsive policy just to find out later that instead of orphaning the
package, next inactive maintainer became owner. Very frustrating ....
I think it may depend on the type of package, for some SIGs at least I think auto-retiring a needed working package is also rather frustrating since it generates extra work for the SIG to recover that package.
Talking of which I just filed two review requests for ghc-fgl (which I had untired last year) and ghc-setlocale:
which will unbreak xmonad and darcs. :-)
Jens
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
