Re: gcc-c++ and libatomic -- link issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/02/19 12:14 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jonathan Wakely:

On 08/02/19 19:56 -0600, Patrick Diehl wrote:
Hi,

I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install
gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is not a dependency of the gcc-c++
package. My program fails, because it can not link against libatomic. Is
this the supposed behavior to install libatomic or should libatomic
become one of the dependencies of gcc-c++?

Not all C++ programs need libatomic. If hpx needs it, I think you
should require it explicitly.

Not all C++ programs need libstdc++ or librt.  Yet both are available by
default.

True.
What's the benefit of not installing libatomic as a dependency of
gcc-c++?

None that I know of. It would mean that certain things Just Work™.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux