On 11/02/19 12:14 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jonathan Wakely:
On 08/02/19 19:56 -0600, Patrick Diehl wrote:
Hi,
I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install
gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is not a dependency of the gcc-c++
package. My program fails, because it can not link against libatomic. Is
this the supposed behavior to install libatomic or should libatomic
become one of the dependencies of gcc-c++?
Not all C++ programs need libatomic. If hpx needs it, I think you
should require it explicitly.
Not all C++ programs need libstdc++ or librt. Yet both are available by
default.
True.
What's the benefit of not installing libatomic as a dependency of
gcc-c++?
None that I know of. It would mean that certain things Just Work™.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
