* Jonathan Wakely: > On 08/02/19 19:56 -0600, Patrick Diehl wrote: >>Hi, >> >>I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install >>gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is not a dependency of the gcc-c++ >>package. My program fails, because it can not link against libatomic. Is >>this the supposed behavior to install libatomic or should libatomic >>become one of the dependencies of gcc-c++? > > Not all C++ programs need libatomic. If hpx needs it, I think you > should require it explicitly. Not all C++ programs need libstdc++ or librt. Yet both are available by default. What's the benefit of not installing libatomic as a dependency of gcc-c++? Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
