On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:14:10PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Jonathan Wakely: > > > On 08/02/19 19:56 -0600, Patrick Diehl wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install > >>gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is not a dependency of the gcc-c++ > >>package. My program fails, because it can not link against libatomic. Is > >>this the supposed behavior to install libatomic or should libatomic > >>become one of the dependencies of gcc-c++? > > > > Not all C++ programs need libatomic. If hpx needs it, I think you > > should require it explicitly. > > Not all C++ programs need libstdc++ or librt. Yet both are available by > default. Don't know why you are mentioning librt, gcc-c++ nor libstdc++ don't have a dependency on librt, either rpm or DT_NEEDED. You have to try hard to avoid libstdc++, that is what you get by default, one needs to use -nostdinc, link with gcc instead of g++, usually disable rtti/exceptions etc. or link with -lsupc++ (which is in libstdc++-devel anyway). Compared to that, most of the C++ programs don't need libatomic, most of them don't need libitm, etc. So, why force it upon everybody when only 0.05% will need it? Jakub _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
