On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 05:27:45PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 3:51 PM Adam Williamson > <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:37 +0100, Michal Schorm wrote: > > > Right. > > > > > > Yes, I'm trying to test the installation from the mirrors. There will > > > be a delay. > > > > > > Buildroot repo != compose repo. > > > That's where I was mistaken. > > > > > > Case closed, I'll wait :) > > > > Just as a note, what's in the 'rawhide' repo right now differs quite a > > lot from what's in the buildroot as we haven't had a successful compose > > since 2019-01-21. This is for various reasons - most recently > > libreoffice needed rebuilding for the poppler soname bump and did not > > build successfully for nearly a week, and now lorax has a dependency > > issue. > > > > (it occurs to me to wonder whether it should be a matter of policy that > > soname rebuilds that involve libreoffice must be done in a side tag, > > but Rawhide package gating may render that concern obsolete soon). > > I would, as a matter of principle, refuse side tags as an acceptable > solution unless all packagers were given the ability to open and close > side tags freely for this purpose. Any comprehensive solution that > would permit Rawhide gating must also permit people an easy way to > submit and merge a multitude of things at once. Otherwise, we're just > screwed and everything gets harder and moves slower. :( > > As an aside, this is the first time in a while I've heard Rawhide > gating brought up. Is there a discussion somewhere about this? It's been in the air for a while and we had a concrete plan for it for a while as well but it has not been prioritised enough until basically two weeks ago. I am trying to get all the people who will be involved to review the current proposal, once it is something that I feel confident about, I'll send an email for more feedback to this list as well as submit it as a change proposal. So do expect to hear more about this before the end of the month :) If you want more info, I'm happy to provide them but I'd rather not expose this to a broad audience until there is no agreement between the different maintainers of the applications impacted by this change. I hope this makes sense. Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
