On 1/30/19 9:45 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 28. 01. 19 18:27, Ben Cotton wrote: >> (Note this change was previously submitted for Fedora 29: >> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2064) >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Retire_YUM_3 > > Based on the entire discussion so far, here's my proposal: > > - we change this to a system wide change > - we move it to Fedora 31 > - we retire the packages from rawhide as soon as f30 is branched > regardless of the dependent packages > - packages with broken deps / FTBFS due to this will be retired if not > fixed by beta freeze +1, but I would like to see some comment from koji developers that this is realistic with their plans or why not. > Contingency mechanism: > > - if some process (releng or similar) needs the packages in order to > ship Fedora 31, the packages are added into a designated copr repo > maintained by the person/team responsible for the tool that needs yum > (or other packages retired) > > - if the above is not possible and the packages are indeed needed in > the actual f31 repos, packages are unretired but the person/team > responsible for the tool that needs yum maintains them as long as they > need them and retires them once that is no longer true I don't think we want to use a copr for this, but we could build the needed packages in our infra-f30 tag, so they would exist and be usable by infra but not in the main repos. Of course we would really like to avoid this... kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
