On 12/13/18 3:14 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le 2018-12-12 18:49, Kevin Fenzi a écrit : ..snip... > >> IMHO, it mostly needs people spending time and driving it. First, >> gathering a list of issues that are non ideal for maintainers, > > That's quite easy to do and you'll find no end of volunteers to document > their packaging roadblocks. And they're not limited to the pagure behavior… Thats not what I am asking for. A flood of untriaged issues is going to hinder rather than help. >> then >> finding out what it would take to solve each and helping create and land >> fixes for them, be that a pagure bugfix or a workflow change or whatever. > > … but only if there is an effort at the Fedora level to act on this > list. That's means infra time, and that means Fedora leadership time to > make sure infra has this time and actually uses it to fix the issues > packagers reported. > > Been there, done that, not interested in filling new issues no one wants > to work on or look at. Already doing too much of that lately. What I was asking for was a prioritized list of triaged issues. This would help greatly in fixing things that would have the most impact. If we can't fix everything, lets at least fix the most painful things first. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
