Re: Proposal: Move to an annual platform release starting at F30

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 27. 11. 18 v 17:04 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
>> In other words, the "technical debt" we are trying to solve here is
>> not project wide and doesn't justify slowing down the whole project
>> permanently.
> I completely disagree.  Our release process and tooling is built on
> heroism and tech debt.

People working on release and people working on packages maintenance are different group - they are not disjunct, but it
is not the same group.
For example *I* am a maintainer of lots of packages, but the additional works because of the fedora release is about one
working day per year - and it is mostly because of fedora-upgrade package. Other packages do not need so much work. I am
more affected by upstream releases.

Do not forget that annual releases will mean that N-1 release will implicate 24 months support for packages which will
mean a much more significant impact on us-the maintaners.

Miroslav
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux