Re: Improving the compose: leave the current compose in place

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:12 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Define what a compose is? Currently it is a word which covers a
> multitude of different processes and reasons for those processes. We
> can't 'fix' or even 'replace' or parallel them without actually
> knowing why someone duct taped this tool to that widget during a 2 am
> release window.

Yes, that's a good point, and something I wanted to say - one of the
starting points is defining exactly what output is needed for a
particular use case and figure out how to get *that* output as fast as
possible. (Probably the normal case will be taking a new build, and
producing a single testable ostree or image containing that build.)

Being able to optimize along a single path is how you get *much*
faster than the current global compose. And why the problem is
probably not best formulated as "speed up the global compose".

Owen
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux