One of the key parts of making a decision to delay/skip F31 is figuring out, ahead of the decision, what the expected experience is for users and packagers. Does F30 have normal stability, or do we try to keep users happy by moving things forward with ad-hoc updates and cross-our-fingers and hope nothing breaks? I tend to think about this in terms of GNOME - would we rebase to GNOME 3.34 in the middle of F30 or not? But there's a lot of other pieces of software where similar considerations apply: container tools, cockpit, NetworkManager, etc. And if we did do updates like that, would we consider respinning media and making a "F30.1"? Owen _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
