On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:39:52AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > While we're on the topic of unicorns, if I were the person actually in > charge of this and had the freedom to do it how I wanted, what I'd > really want to do is create a much more *modular* compose process, > where inputs and outputs were defined and associated with each other, > and you could easily define subsets to be produced at different times > for different reasons. Not a compose, but a Compose Construction Kit. A > big chunk of the length of "the compose" is associated with the fact > that we define "the compose" as a single thing which produces (last > time I counted) 70+ deliverables. If we had an easy way to say 'ok, > right now we need a compose which produces A, B, C and D from the > minimum necessary sets of inputs', that would be a massive improvement. +1000 -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
