Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 20:03 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> 
> Also, I find it funny that - somehow - tons of resources would be
> available for "better CI pipeline tests for everything" (!), but we'd
> have to "focus resources" when it comes to the fedora "platform"
> itself.

These two sort of go together, I think: we don't truly expect to have
'better CI pipeline tests for EVERYTHING', as in *every package in the
distro*, but rather one advantage of somehow defining the 'Platform' is
that it gives us a *smaller* set of bits to focus the CI work on.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux