Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/19/2018 10:04 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Centos also ships a lot of non-Red Hat kernels and modules which
meet various itches that people feel (xen, upstream lts, various
gluster/ceph/arm32/etc)

I wonder if something like this could make sense for Fedora as well, to
ship two kernel streams. "kernel" that has latest kernel, and
"kernel-lts" that has the LTS kernel that was latest when this Fedora
version was first released. "kernel" would get continuously rebased to
latest version, and "kernel-lts" would just stay on the same version the
whole life cycle.

If some classes of users (hardware vendors) prefer LTS kernel, and some
classes of users (people installing their computers themselves and
wanting latest hardware support) prefer latest kernel, we should be able
to make both happy.

--
Kalev
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux