On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 5:30 PM Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am 18.11.18 um 23:19 schrieb Neal Gompa: > > I think it's quite obvious why. No one can really influence what's in > > CentOS. Red Hat Enterprise Linux itself is developed mostly behind > > closed doors, after forking a Fedora release. > > that must be why they ship a completly closed source windows.... But for Windows, ODMs/OEMs benefit from the ecosystem of components already building and targeting for that platform. And even Microsoft does provide toolkits and assistance for major PC makers to better support the Windows platform. And the Windows release lifecycle is directly set up to support PC makers. Fedora has a wonderful advantage in that our ethos and practice in developing the distribution[1] often means we're directly plugged in with the various upstreams and can help make things better. We can provide that ecosystem value for PC makers, and by that token, we can add major value over other Linux distributions and offer a positive relationship to PC makers to encourage them to ship Linux on their PCs, specifically Fedora. [1]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Staying_close_to_upstream_projects -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
