Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Przemek Klosowski:

> I wonder if RedHat could be persuaded to modify their process to adopt
> a Fedora release instead of forking it, and backport into that
> release---let's call it "Fedora LTS a.k.a. CentOS Release Candidate"
> (FLAC-RC :). It would require perhaps more effort on the part of
> RedHat to avoid breakage in the middle of their development cycle, but
> that's probably a good CI practice anyway.

I'm not sure if the substantial changes in minor releases of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux would be acceptable to device vendors.  Red Hat
Enterprise Linux is a commercially supported distribution, but includes
substantially more changes than typical LTS releases.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux