Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michal Schorm wrote:
> We, as a distro, just take a different approach.
> To be bleeding edge requires to have releases often.
> 
> That allow us to manage changes like GCC, OpenSSL and so on quickly.
> Struggling with upstream who don't adapt, can't adapt or don't want to
> adapt at the same speed. (And OpenSSL patch isn't something you'd want
> to write for serveral pojects you maintain ...)
> 
> That is what make us different distro with its own user base. Want the
> very same but LTS system? try CentOS. Or RHEL.

+1. LTS Fedora is what CentOS is for. Why should we not just point users who 
want LTS to CentOS and EPEL?

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux