Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Matthew Miller:

> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:30:06PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> I love Fedora, but the idea that you can take a 3 year old Fedora and
>> put it out on the web is just bonkers. We don't have the manpower and
>> the procedures to make Fedora suitable for this kind of use. 
>
> Wellllllll, from my statistics, there's a lot of 3-year-old (and older!)
> Fedora out on the web today. But that aside, let's say we wanted to do it
> right *and* still keep the distro exciting and fun to hack on.
>
> What person-power and procedures would we need to add?

Make it cheap to maintain branches.  I expect that one what to achieve
this would be to build directly out of Git, with synthesized release
numbers and changelogs.  This way, you can apply a lot of fixes to
multiple branches without encountering mandatory conflicts.

There is no technical reason why the payload in an SRPMs cannot contain
the full exploded upstream source tree, with an RPM spec file in the
root.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux