Re: Ursa Major (modules in buildroot) enablement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neal Gompa wrote:
> Moreover, as it stands, I don't think modularity provides any quality
> of life improvements for packagers within Fedora (it adds extra steps
> and makes it confusing to figure out what is maintained),

There is one I can see in that it allows packagers to make their packages 
depend on incompatible library versions, which makes their job easier (by 
not having to care about compatibility, patching for different library 
versions, etc.) at the expense of the users that are left with an unsolvable 
Module Hell and the total impossibility to install the software they need.

But obviously, I think this is a very poor tradeoff. Helping packagers must 
not happen at the end users' expense!

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux