On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 4:48 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 07:44:12PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > It'd be nice if someone from up top would deign to come and talk to us > > directly... > > Communications are pretty carefully controlled for regulatory reasons, and > the fact is even those at the top don't know everything yet. And speculation > is basically right out. That said, I'm working on what I can do here. Are > there specific things you'd like to ask? When did the engineering staff know? Will IBM push Red Hat towards, or away, from their current level of worldwide telecommuting? Whose management will be in charge on a day to day basis? What will be the relationship with Fedora? Will Red Hat engineers be as encouraged as they are now to publish software and fixes to the Fedora releases? Will the CentOS core development team stay employed by Red Hat? What is the expected release date for RHEL 8, so I can stop building the *very* large dependency chains between current Fedora components I need to backport to RHEL 7 and CentOS 7? Will IBM and Red Hat rein in the "let's replace another system function into systemd that has nothing to do with logging or daemon management" ? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx