On 20/09/2018 21:30, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 18:17, Jonathan Underwood
In the process of orphaning a few packages lately, I noticed that the
user "cicku" (Christopher Meng) still had commit or admin privelidges
on the package. That user hasn't been active for a couple of years,
and I vaguely remember packages that he owned being orphaned. But, it
seems like packages where he was co-maintainer had no changes.
Is this desirable for inactive developers? What if their account
became compromised? Would it be better if the inactive maintainer
process removed priviliges across all packages, rather than only
orphaning the packages they own?
I forgot to add this ticket for the relevant non-responsive maintainer
ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1542
Yeah, cicku has been inactive for some time, his last build succeeded
more than two years ago.
However, the ticket suggests, that the non-responsive maintainer process
has not been followed correctly.
Anyways, there was the FESCO decision to orphan his packages [1], it
seems that didn't happen completely?
Matthias
[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/4LK26PNK22QTNVSZ26KWIFA5G4SXUHWC/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
