On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 18:17, Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > In the process of orphaning a few packages lately, I noticed that the > user "cicku" (Christopher Meng) still had commit or admin privelidges > on the package. That user hasn't been active for a couple of years, > and I vaguely remember packages that he owned being orphaned. But, it > seems like packages where he was co-maintainer had no changes. > > Is this desirable for inactive developers? What if their account > became compromised? Would it be better if the inactive maintainer > process removed priviliges across all packages, rather than only > orphaning the packages they own? > I forgot to add this ticket for the relevant non-responsive maintainer ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1542 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
