On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 03:20:59AM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > >> > >> Er, do you mean exim-doc, which was split into a separate package? Exim > >> itself is fairly tiny and is a potential candidate for being the default > >> MTA. There was no discussion of removing Exim entirely, and it was > >> shipped in FC3. > > > >For exim I think we should continue to put it into FC-devel, but > >only exclude it from FC4 if the space requirements need this removal. > > > >greetings, > > I'm thinking for the future - why don't we consider pulling this > discussion off of fedora-devel and onto fedora-maintainers? Sound > reasonable? Yes, that will be the right spot. greetings, Florian La Roche
