>> >> Er, do you mean exim-doc, which was split into a separate package? Exim >> itself is fairly tiny and is a potential candidate for being the default >> MTA. There was no discussion of removing Exim entirely, and it was >> shipped in FC3. > >For exim I think we should continue to put it into FC-devel, but >only exclude it from FC4 if the space requirements need this removal. > >greetings, I'm thinking for the future - why don't we consider pulling this discussion off of fedora-devel and onto fedora-maintainers? Sound reasonable? -sv
