Le jeudi 24 fÃvrier 2005 Ã 07:59 +0000, David Woodhouse a Ãcrit : > On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 23:37 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >> Packages removed from Fedora Core 4 development tree on 2005-02-23 > >> ... > >> exim > > Er, do you mean exim-doc, which was split into a separate package? I am really again this idea ! Perhaps we could reduce the size of exim-doc. from exim-doc-4.43-1.FC3.1 : $ du -s /usr/share/doc/exim-doc-4.43/* /usr/share/doc/exim-doc-4.43/ 152 /usr/share/doc/exim-doc-4.43/config.samples 1340 /usr/share/doc/exim-doc-4.43/faq 3336 /usr/share/doc/exim-doc-4.43/html 1320 /usr/share/doc/exim-doc-4.43/pdf 2540 /usr/share/doc/exim-doc-4.43/ps 1512 /usr/share/doc/exim-doc-4.43/texinfo 10204 /usr/share/doc/exim-doc-4.43/ We can remove faq/ (already in html/) pdf/ ps/ and texinfo/ . In this case, we have : $ du -s /usr/share/doc/exim-doc-4.43/ 3492 /usr/share/doc/exim-doc-4.43/ Some examples : $ du -s gcc-3.4.2 postgresql-7.4.7 libxml2-devel-2.6.16 xorg-x11- doc-6.8.1.902 rpm-devel-4.3.2 qt-devel-3.3.3 8088 gcc-3.4.2 6956 postgresql-7.4.7 7832 libxml2-devel-2.6.16 10752 xorg-x11-doc-6.8.1.902 21852 rpm-devel-4.3.2 37136 qt-devel-3.3.3 Should we remove gcc, postgresql, libxml2, xorg-x11, rpm-devel, qt-devel doc ? Too bad.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
