On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 06/04/2018 02:50 PM, Jeff Backus wrote:
Thanks for the data. 25k is still a pretty healthy number. :) I realize that there are a lot of unknowns in the data, so it is difficult to draw any hard conclusions, but 25k is still much larger than 0. Splitting into i686 into i586 and i686 would give more insight into who still needs non-SSE2... Probably hurts my argument, though. :)
Jeff,
If you want to do the work involved to split up the 32-bit arches please do it.
The discussion going on here is not a democratic vote on if non-x86_64 CPUs are supported. :)
Fair point. :)
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/WNMZXU23ME5KYXO4B77HLKSLUJUEBIBL/
