On 06/01/2018 05:06 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > It is irony, that people, who are capable to get into the grub menu if > they need, complain about it being hidden. So to say, I am 100% for > hiding the grub menu, speeding up the boot process, and if need it, I'll > find a way to get it. I fail to see any irony here. When I need to get into the grub menu, it's usually an emergency (or at least highly-stressful) situation, with no documentation handy, and flailing about trying to figure out how to make it appear just adds to the stress and the blue tinge of the air in my vicinity. What *exactly* is this trying to solve? IIRC, the patch is to hide the grub menu IFF there's only one kernel because 'it serves no useful function.' A number of people (myself included) have disputed that assertion. If the assertion is invalid, the patch shouldn't be applied. Correct? That seems simple enough. Or maybe I don't understand the process, lacking sufficient Fedora-devel-fu karma. How many non-tech end users install Fedora straight from the distro, as opposed to those who install a frobbed version, with different defaults, from a repackager? _I.e._, repackagers can set grub up however they like. Is Fedora's goal to be end-user friendly, tech friendly, or the all-singing all-dancing Linux distro? -- #ken B-|} Ken, Baron Coar RHCA, RHCVA, Sanagendamgagwedweinini Red Hat IT Infrastructure _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/VZMJFSW4BX63THDFN525SKRKGYHOB6GX/
