Re: VM in a logical volume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> For the benefit of anybody with the same problem, the CPU pegged at 100% +
>> unresponsive installer problem is this bug:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577282
>>
>> Fortunately, I can give my VM 2 GB to install, but wow.  The combination
>> of those two bugs is pretty nasty.
>
>
> It gets even more interesting.  After installation, I dropped the F28 VM's
> memory allocation back down to 1 GB.  I have a bunch of other Linux VMs
> (Debian, OpenSUSE, RHEL, etc.) that all run comfortably in 1 GB, so why not
> F28?  The VM was extremely sluggish when I booted it up.  Sure enough, it
> was swapping.  I shut it down, gave it 2 GB again, and now it boots up quite
> snappily.  It appears that, with a default GNOME install, just logging in
> one user eats more than 1 GB.  Here are all of the processes that require
> more than 2% of the RAM:
>
> # ps aux --sort -rss
> USER       PID %CPU %MEM    VSZ   RSS TTY      STAT START   TIME COMMAND
> jjames    1624  3.7 13.3 3645396 272260 tty2   Sl+  15:32   0:14
> /usr/bin/gnome-shell
> gdm       1253  1.0 10.1 3575436 207160 tty1   Sl+  15:32   0:04
> /usr/bin/gnome-shell
> root      1331  0.7  7.4 884820 151232 ?       Ssl  15:32   0:03
> /usr/libexec/packagekitd
> jjames    1994  0.5  4.9 1551964 100140 tty2   Sl+  15:32   0:02
> /usr/bin/gnome-software --gapplication-service
> jjames    1962  0.0  2.7 101987380 56800 tty2  Sl+  15:32   0:00
> /usr/libexec/evolution/evolution-alarm-notify
> jjames    1691  0.0  2.3 826252 48532 tty2     Sl   15:32   0:00
> /usr/libexec/ibus-x11 --kill-daemon
> gdm       1305  0.0  2.3 826264 48520 tty1     Sl   15:32   0:00
> /usr/libexec/ibus-x11 --kill-daemon
> jjames    2078  0.0  2.3 102052544 48364 ?     Sl   15:32   0:00
> /usr/libexec/evolution-addressbook-factory-subprocess
> jjames    1731  0.0  2.2 101785312 46020 ?     Ssl  15:32   0:00
> /usr/libexec/evolution-source-registry
> jjames    1930  0.0  2.2 118705576 45988 ?     Ssl  15:32   0:00
> /usr/libexec/evolution-calendar-factory
> jjames    2041  0.0  2.2 102275740 45784 ?     Sl   15:32   0:00
> /usr/libexec/evolution-calendar-factory-subprocess
> jjames    2055  0.0  2.2 101921944 45680 ?     Ssl  15:32   0:00
> /usr/libexec/evolution-addressbook-factory
> jjames    1708  0.0  2.2 118475300 45508 ?     Sl   15:32   0:00
> /usr/libexec/gnome-shell-calendar-server
>
> The resident size of those processes adds up to 1161988 KB.  There's our 1
> GB.  And I haven't even run anything I want to run yet.


Consistent with my earlier findings. I have no idea why packagekitd or
gnome-software are even running (by default) on liveOS. The double
gnome-shell with extra for gdm is not a bug per se but is known about
and is suboptimal. Those three make up about 25% of the total used.
It's pretty oinky. Also there's some separate memory reduction work
sup posedly happening for gnome-shell but I'm not sure what the status
of that is.


-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/4HKKO6SSQSFRRBSMWOVDD252SWIDVS37/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux