On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 04:27:15PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>> On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 15:46 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >>> > Fedora package maintainers, >>> > >>> > FESCo approved an updated policy for packages which fail to build >>> > from >>> > source during mass rebuilds (FTBFS) [1]. >>> >>> Please list all candidates packages to be retired , last time Till >>> check was about 2000 IIRC >> >> There is no final list yet. I am currently rebuilding several packages >> to ensure that there is a bug report for each package. The most accurate >> list can be found here: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1555378&hide_resolved=1 >> >> During the F28 rebuild, the process failed to trigger a rebuild for a >> lot of packages. I rebuilt a lot of them a while ago but I missed some, >> too (I guess all packages that were rebuilt after the F26 mass rebuild >> but not for F28). I am rebuilding them now, too. Also I will rebuild >> packages for which a bug report is missing or lacks the log files. >> > > Can you check that whatever scripts are doing this work are filing > sensible bug reports? I got this: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582774 > > which has totally wrong text. This isn't a Fedora 28 FTBFS -- it's a > Fedora 29 FTBFS. Well the current ones are based on the FTBFS of the F-28 mass rebuild so it's partially correct even if the FTB is reported against a f29 build. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/G4FUS2YH4NAMZSM6W55OZNHG2M5BQ72Q/
