On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 04:27:15PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 15:46 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> > Fedora package maintainers, >> > >> > FESCo approved an updated policy for packages which fail to build >> > from >> > source during mass rebuilds (FTBFS) [1]. >> >> Please list all candidates packages to be retired , last time Till >> check was about 2000 IIRC > > There is no final list yet. I am currently rebuilding several packages > to ensure that there is a bug report for each package. The most accurate > list can be found here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1555378&hide_resolved=1 > > During the F28 rebuild, the process failed to trigger a rebuild for a > lot of packages. I rebuilt a lot of them a while ago but I missed some, > too (I guess all packages that were rebuilt after the F26 mass rebuild > but not for F28). I am rebuilding them now, too. Also I will rebuild > packages for which a bug report is missing or lacks the log files. > Can you check that whatever scripts are doing this work are filing sensible bug reports? I got this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582774 which has totally wrong text. This isn't a Fedora 28 FTBFS -- it's a Fedora 29 FTBFS. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/AVTBO4AFDCUWZ732VZ5SGBRSHDXIGAHK/
