On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 18:58 -0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:18:10 -0500, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I hope the fortran part of gcc4 has caught up [to do everything > > > gcc3-f77 does]. I guess I should go back and try gcc4 again. > > > > Which reminds me. Is fortran really used by enough people to justify > > its presence in -core ? (Even if so, does it really need to be in the > > default install?) > > It's still used quite a bit in natural sciences (e.g. Physics, > Chemistry, etc), but if it's moved to extras, nobody will miss it, > since the admins will know where to find it. The question is -- can it > be successfully unmarried from the rest of gcc? Doesn't octave require it to build? -- Gérard Milmeister Langackerstrasse 49 CH-8057 Zürich
