On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:18:10 -0500, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I hope the fortran part of gcc4 has caught up [to do everything > > gcc3-f77 does]. I guess I should go back and try gcc4 again. > > Which reminds me. Is fortran really used by enough people to justify > its presence in -core ? (Even if so, does it really need to be in the > default install?) It's still used quite a bit in natural sciences (e.g. Physics, Chemistry, etc), but if it's moved to extras, nobody will miss it, since the admins will know where to find it. The question is -- can it be successfully unmarried from the rest of gcc? Regards, -- Konstantin Ryabitsev Zlotniks, INC
