* Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> [2005-02-21 17:55]: > Thomas Steenholdt (tmus@xxxxxxx) said: > > Seems to me, that the non-default gcc bundle could go in extras as well... > > > > That is, keep the version that the system was built with and throw the other > > in extras. > > Alternatively, move to GCC 4, and drop a compiler that way. +1 Andrew