Re: Purpose of non-user visible groups in comps?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(Adding Kalev too ...)

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:28:33PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 10:49 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> 
> In general, non-user-visible groups exist for a couple of purposes.
> Many exist to be used in the compose process - they define groups we
> want to pull into images, but we don't want users to be able to use
> them directly. Another case is the critical-path groups, which exist
> specifically for the purpose of defining the contents of the 'critical
> path' and not for any other purpose - it wouldn't make sense for these
> to be visible in anaconda/dnf.
> 
> > I'm looking at updating the groups in comps for MinGW and there is already
> > a mingw32 group but it's not user visible.
> > 
> > My plan would be to update it so there is a user visible group, something
> > to the effect of "MinGW Development" that would install a basic mingw
> > development environment for both 32 and 64 bit windows applications.
> > 
> > Is there any special handling that needs to be done of the old group? Or
> > should I leave it alone and just create the new group?
> 
> I am always fond of referring to G.K. Chesterton when this sort of
> question comes up:
> 
> https://www.chesterton.org/taking-a-fence-down/
> 
> that is, before changing anything, figure out *why it is the way it is
> now*.
> 
> With that in mind...let's go detecting. The group was added in 2009 by
> Richard Jones and, at that time, was user-visible:
> 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/c/70f5f78b356c97a3b79a1a38b9a2ff573ad5f316
> 
> It was made non-user-visible by Bill Nottingham, in this commit, for
> the F18 release:
> 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/c/2adbfb571ed41f3b45618126d39613a279c4435b
> 
> The commit message is:
> 
> "Assorted cleanups & additions.
> 
> 1) Mark a bunch of components that are showing up in the installer where they shouldn't as not-user-visible.
> 2) Add some more proper clustering & HA groups rather than the old one."
> 
> So, I guess the thing to do would be to ask Bill how he came to the
> conclusion that this group "shouldn't" show up in the installer, and
> whether that conclusion is truly/still valid. Let's CC him! And
> Richard, too.
> -- 
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/SVB2RDJ65RWHQZMFNCMSMEWHNI5O4B37/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux