Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/29/18 11:45 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Assuming that the plan is to leave it enabled in F-29 on branching and
>> have it ship enabled in F-29 I agree, if the intention is to leave it
>> enabled in rawhide and disable it on branching then the Change
>> Proposal mechanism isn't the way to ensure wider knowledge.
> I'd be happy to have it left on for F29, it /might/ even be default upstream
> by the time F29 ships.  I'll need to re-familiarize myself w/ the 
> "System-Wide Change Proposal" process, I guess.
> 
> FWIW, turning it on has very little effect until it's actually used, so it
> really should not be destabilizing for most, even if bugs lurk.  ;)
> 
> -Eric

Getting back on topic (back from the Shrink Wars), I'd like to get this
turned on.  I'd prefer to do this via a soon-to-land patch which enables
config files for mkfs, so that distros can set their own defaults without
having to patch source.  I'm going to give it a bit of time to see if we
can get that upstream, and then will see about simply shipping that
patch along w/ a config file that enables reflink for F29.

Thanks,
-Eric
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux