On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:14 PM Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> "CW" == Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > CW> I'd say it makes sense to revisit the default here globally in > CW> Anaconda. > Maybe. Have the issues which made XFS less suitable for use on laptops > been resolved? The primary one I recall was that each mounted > filesystem would have a corresponding kernel thread doing about 20 > wakeups per second. This was not really good for battery life and power > consumption in general. > Last I checked (which was 2016 or so) those wakeups were slated to be > around for a while longer. > https://www.spinics.net/lists/xfs/msg40210.html And there's still the fun restriction of XFS not being able to shrink. It's not particularly important in the server case, but in the desktop/laptop case, it happens enough in my experience that I'm not sure I'd want a default filesystem that can't shrink. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
