Re: Best way to handle sub-package conflicts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 12:44:37 -0400, Digimer wrote:

>   I think "Conflict" is the way to go. However, given how much the guide
> urges not to use 'Conflicts', I worry that will make it
> harder/impossible later to have the package accepted into Fedora.
> 
>   Would a use-case like this be an acceptable exception, would you guess?
> 
>   As I mentioned in my reply to Micheal, I am not worried about
> auto-removal. If it simply refused to install one sub-package until the
> other is gone, that's fine.

There are runtime solutions, such as using "alternatives", which you may
need to use to get such packages accepted into the Fedora package
collection.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux