On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 08:56:32PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently, a fedpkg global option --module-name could confuse some > packagers easily because word "module" is sort of ambiguous with the > module introduced by Fedora Modularity. This option is used for > specifying a repository name manually instead of guessing that from git > push URL or the macro name in SPEC file. > > To avoid the confusion, it would be nice to use another name, for > example --repository-name or --package-name. I personally prefer the > former one. Before making this change, I'd like to hear your thoughts. > > * --repository-name or --package-name, what do you think which one is > proper for fedpkg? > > * How do you use --module-name in your practice? > > * Is it ok to rename it directly without keeping the original name, or > to keep --module-name for a period of time so that you have time to > migrate to new name? What about simply --name ? (Possibly together with a --namespace?) I'd still include the --module-name though if possible deprecate it in the UI. Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
