Re: Improving the glibc32 situation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 02:58:37PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 14:07 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Some x86_64 packages need a 32-bit glibc during build time.  Koji
> > does not provide it.
> > [...]
> > Comments?  Suggestions?
> 
> Why don't we just make koji provide it?
> That is how a normal 64bit Fedora install looks like. Those have the
> 32bit packages available. So it makes sense to me that the koji build
> repo also provides it for consistency. Why isn't the koji buildroot
> just like a normal install?

The right fix would be to make koji deal with multilibs properly,
mock can handle that fine already, then glibc32 wouldn't be needed at all.

If that doesn't happen, we need glibc32, but only 0.01% of packages actually
need it, so e.g. forcing it into every buildroot would be a vaste of time.

	Jakub
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux