I've been receiving e-mails that say that one of my packages has broken dependencies, but I believe the dependencies are satisfied. Is the system that generates these e-mails unaware of rich rpm dependencies, perhaps? -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Broken dependencies: rust-chan Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:09:08 +0000 (UTC) From: buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To: rust-chan-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx rust-chan has broken dependencies in the F-28 tree: On x86_64: rust-chan-devel-0.1.21-2.fc28.noarch requires (crate(rand) >= 0.4.0 with crate(rand) < 0.5.0) On armhfp: rust-chan-devel-0.1.21-2.fc28.noarch requires (crate(rand) >= 0.4.0 with crate(rand) < 0.5.0) On ppc64le: rust-chan-devel-0.1.21-2.fc28.noarch requires (crate(rand) >= 0.4.0 with crate(rand) < 0.5.0) On aarch64: rust-chan-devel-0.1.21-2.fc28.noarch requires (crate(rand) >= 0.4.0 with crate(rand) < 0.5.0) On ppc64: rust-chan-devel-0.1.21-2.fc28.noarch requires (crate(rand) >= 0.4.0 with crate(rand) < 0.5.0) On s390x: rust-chan-devel-0.1.21-2.fc28.noarch requires (crate(rand) >= 0.4.0 with crate(rand) < 0.5.0) On i386: rust-chan-devel-0.1.21-2.fc28.noarch requires (crate(rand) >= 0.4.0 with crate(rand) < 0.5.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
