On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:03 AM, J. Randall Owens <jrowens.fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was thinking about 2 last package releases by upstream, that has been packed into Fedora.
(So if fedora skipped some upstream release, still keeping 2 last upstream release packed)
However It was just a thought in general, on how to have changelogs shorter.
I'm not sure if it would really work as good as I imagine.
When you say 2 releases, are you talking about package or Fedora
releases? I'd favour an approach of keeping all the changes since
release, or since branching might be even better, or since the release
before the package's release, myself. 2 package releases seems a bit curt.
I was thinking about 2 last package releases by upstream, that has been packed into Fedora.
(So if fedora skipped some upstream release, still keeping 2 last upstream release packed)
However It was just a thought in general, on how to have changelogs shorter.
I'm not sure if it would really work as good as I imagine.
--
Michal Schorm
Associate Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
