Hello,
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Koji, or fedpkg, or better yet some hook in rpm itself. It's not exactly rocket science we're talking about here if people are ready to give it a go.On 02/09/2018 03:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 05:02:10PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
It seems that a lot of people have %file, %check, %build, %whatsoever
in their changelog section.
Is there any reason I should not go and automatically escape them?
This seems like a lot of churn. If we're going to do this, let's go big
and get rid of RPM changelogs.
When we have a package update, there are basically two different kinds
of changelog information. Well, three.
First, there's the upstream changelog. We don't generally do much with
these except maybe package as %doc.
Second, there's package maintainer changelogs. These are really
redundant with the dist-git log. We don't really need this anymore.
It's just a chore.
Third, though, there's end-user information. Why should a user care
*This* is redundant with bodhi update info, at least if packagers fill
that out, and it often also duplicates upstream changelogs, *and* it
often also covers things like "fixes CVE-####' also carried the
specfile changelog.
This is neither most helpful for user *nor* ideal for packages. Why
don't we drop changelogs entirely in favor of 1) using the dist-git
logs for specfile maintainers and 2) providing the end-user information
in a different way. This could be through specially formatted log lines
going with the commit, or it could be simply in a standard separate
file (`fedora.user-visible-changes`). Optionally, it could include both
a high level end-user summary, and a detailed description for sysadmins
and the curious.
Wherever it lives, this would be read by Bodhi, so there's
would be need to enter it more than once. And, perhaps a DNF plugin
could be made to read and display this information for systems
administrators.
I fully support the removal of RPM changelogs. However, you've missed
two cases:
1) Rawhide, which doesn't go through bodhi
2) Fedora release upgrades, which don't go through bodhi
Now, I would actually LOVE for Rawhide to go through bodhi but
whatever. The release -> release upgrade isn't really solvable that
way though.
Someone else suggested changelogs could be inserted during koji build
time. That would be interesting to look into.
I actually looked yesterday if I could make a PR for rpm implementing it but I couldn't really find a good way to do it. So I decided to implement it
in `rpkg-client` (https://pagure.io/rpkg-client/branch/spec_preprocessor - basically a hack upon python-rpkg library) by spec preprocessing. So,
with that development version of rpkg, you can have specs (or rather spec templates) like this in your Git project:
Name: {{{ git_name }}}
Version: {{{ git_version }}}
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: This is a test package.
License: GPLv2+
URL: https://someurl.org
Source: {{{ make_source }}}
%description
This is a test package.
%prep
{{{ setup }}}
{{{ git_change_log }}}
Name: {{{ git_name }}}
Version: {{{ git_version }}}
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: This is a test package.
License: GPLv2+
URL: https://someurl.org
Source: {{{ make_source }}}
%description
This is a test package.
%prep
{{{ setup }}}
{{{ git_change_log }}}
rpkg will take that spec template and replace the {{{ ... }}} tags with standard output of the commands inside the braces (git_name, git_version, make_source, setup, git_change_log are all shell functions). Afterwards,
the generated spec is used to e.g. create an srpm (done by `rpkg srpm` command).
I haven't actually implemented the `git_change_log` function yet (nor the other functions except for `make_source`) like Igor did - currently it just always returns '%changelog' and that's it but I wanted to show this to possibly get some feedback.
Thank you
clime
Neal, doesn't Mageia (and Mandriva) pull package changelogs from SCM already? Do you know what kind of hook they're using? Actually I think Suse does this too so Fedora is probably again the last one to adopt this...
- Panu -
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
