On 01/23/2018 05:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > The initial thought we - we being Tim, Kamil, Josef, Ralph and I - had > is to simply invert the policy, if we can, so it becomes "the update > passes *unless* we can find a 'fail' for any of the required tests". So > all updates would be push-able (so far as this mechanism is concerned, > ignoring all the old ones) until one of the gating tests definitely > failed. This sounds like a reasonable workaround to me. > If we can't do that, we're going to just have to disable the gating > again until this is sorted out; we're definitely of the opinion that > Taskotron doesn't yet provide enough of a solid guarantee that all the > tests will be run for a policy which *assumes* that will be the case to > be viable. I agree, the gating is a bit too unreliable as is to stay in its current state.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
